Court ‘questions’ EFCC, Zenith to Explain Why Fayose’s Account was Frozen

Lere Olayinka, spokesman of Ayode Fayose, governor of Ekiti state, says the federal high court, Ado-Ekiti, has ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and Zenith Bank plc to “show cause why an order ex parte to un freeze the governor’s accounts should not be granted.

According to Olayinka, the judge gave Monday July 4 for the anti-graft agency and Zenith bank Plc to appear in court with the said evidence.

He said Mike Ozekhome (SAN), had filed an ex parte order deposed to last week by Bimpe Olatemiju, seeking a mandatory order de-freezing the account belonging and operated by him pending the determination of his interlocutory application.

Joined in the suit are the EFCC (1st defendant) and Zenith bank (2nd defendant). The order was supported by an 18-paragraph affidavit , a lone exhibit, which was a letter issued to Fayose by Zenith bank confirming that the EFCC actually placed a restriction order on the accounts, and a written address.

“He also sought the leave of the court for the service of the originating summons on the defendants in their various addresses outside the jurisdiction of the court as contained on the order papers, supported by 17-paragraph affidavit,” read Olayinka’s statement.

“Ozekhome said the order was brought pursuant to order 26 rule 8(1) of the Federal High Court Civil Procedure Rule 2009 and Section 44(1) of the 1999 constitution which gives the court the discretionary powers to adjudicate on such matter.

“Citing the case of Abdulaziz Nyako Vs EFCC to buttress his position that the anti-graft agency has no power to freeze Fayose’s account
without valid court order, Ozekhome added the action was a flagrant negation of the Section 308 of the constitution, which conferred
absolute immunity on the government against civil and criminal procedure.

“He said it was appalling that the EFCC could play ostrich to these valid constitutional requirements and took cognizance of the African
Charters on Human and People’s Rights before taking the punitive stand against Fayose, adding that these infractions had rendered the action unconstitutional, wrongful, null and void.

“Delivering his ruling, Justice Taiwo Taiwo, said that he quite understood that the applicant (Fayose) enjoys immunity and that the
court can adjudicate on this matter as canvassed by the counsel to the plaintiff, but he pointed out that the relief he basically sought was
a mandatory order of the court.

The statement quoted the judge as saying: “I quite agree that the applicant has immunity pursuant to provisions of the constitution, but it is glaring that the application he is requesting for is a mandatory order to undo what had already been done and the court can’t abdicate its duty under this circumstance.

“I am of the opinion that this mandatory order is better granted with the interlocutory order being sought through an application pending
before the court, because the applicant has filed all papers to this effect.

“I hereby order the 1st and 2nd respondents to appear before this honourable court on July 4, 2016 and show cause why the order should
be refused.

“This is not a refusal of the order, I have not refused it, but I only put it in abeyance, which I said is without prejudice to what will be the
position of the respondents.

“But a leave is granted for the service of the defendants with the originating summons in their respective addresses as contained on the
order papers.”

The statement also quoted Ozekhome as describing the presiding judge as “very at home with the law and a highly experience lawyer”.

He was quoted to have told journalists: “Our motion was an ex parte for the de-freezing and removal of restriction placed on citizen Ayodele Fayose ‘s two accounts with the Zenith Bank Plc.

“The bank claimed through a letter made available to our client that it acted on the instructions of the EFCC and we are here by way of
originating summons to say that the EFCC has no powers, whether under the EFCC Act, money laundering Act, under the constitution or any other known law to freeze the accounts of a sitting governor who enjoys immunity under section 308 of the Constitution of Federal
Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as altered because that section makes it clear that for the time that person is in that office, the President,
Vice-President, Governor and Deputy-Governor he enjoys absolute immunity from any civil or criminal procedure and that no court
process can issue against such person.

“So, EFCC could not have obtained an order ex parte to freeze his account, if they did that, it is illegal, null and void. It could also
not have frozen his accounts without having an order Experts.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s